I thought the United States Supreme Court could never make a worst decision than Bush v. Gore, in which they decided, 5-4, a Presidential election.  I was wrong.

     In another 5-4 decision, made today, the Court decided that the First Amendment grants the same rights to corporations as it does to you and me.  McCain-Feingold is virtually out the window, and with it your vote and mine.  Now, unfettered by any regulation, corporations can spend unlimited amounts to back political candidates of their choice, just as they can on issues.  They can literally buy legislators of their choosing.  And they will.

     As the only industrialized nation without universal health care, we have just endured a painful lesson in how lies, distortion, and corporate money can defeat a proposal that would not only have been cost-effective for us, but would have improved our medical capability.  That’s gone, it’s over;  corporate money has defeated health care.

     Now, on top of that, corporations and big business can spend as much as they like to elect the politicians they can control.  Pour money into elections, win elections;  in our sound-bite society that’s enough to sway people, to fill the airwaves with well-crafted and glossy falsehoods which will be deceptively, cunningly fodder for the naive, for those who don’t know to dig beneath the surface to find the truth.  Corporations have the same rights as we do, except for one thing — they can’t vote but they don’t need to; they can buy election results.  We, as individuals,  can vote but there is no way we can compete against that.  It’s a stacked election.  We vote, they win.

     The First Amendment is probably one of the most precious gifts from our Founding Fathers, but could they have ever forseen today’s decision?  Well,  Thomas Jefferson wanted to put constraints, and even term limits, on corporations, but he was unsuccessful.  There cannot be any justification to suck the blood out of our democracy, and our world as we know it.  But I fear it is coming.

And it’s all based on the note of a Supreme Court reporter of decisions, not the words of the Justices.

     In the case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railway Co., in 1886 (118 U.S. 394) the court reporter, in his summary, stated that the Court had held that corporations are persons within the intent of the 14th Amendment. 

     They are not — corporations are artificial entities, not persons, and while they certainly are entitled to the protection of their rights, there is a fine line which has to differentiate a corporation from a living, breathing person –they should not have the protections of the individual.   Corporations did not flee oppression in Europe, nor did they spill their blood to secure our liberty.  President Dwight Eisenhower was prescient when he warned, over a half centruy ago, of the dangers of the military-industrial complex. 

     The incredible thing is that the decision of the Court in the Santa Clara County case no place held what the court reporter (a former employee of a railroad, incidentally) stated.  And yet it has somehow found its way into our jurisprudence.  Thus, our country turns on a statement which is not within the language of the Supreme Court in the seminal case, now taken many steps further by today’s Supreme Court majority, who have fashioned one of the most destructive decisions  to our democracy that one could imagine, and one that will cast the majority in infamy.

     My vote has become meaningless, and so has yours.  If not democracy in America, where?

BLOGS

     If the Internet has done nothing else, it has given voices to the multitudes, an outlet for expression which has never been previously available.  And then there’s Facebook, Twitter, cell phones, Ifones, and who knows what else.  That’s the good news and the bad news.

     The opportunity for immediate access to news — and responsible opinion — is wonderful, but at the same time, the opportunity for misinformation, sensationism, bigoted opinions are part of the equation.  We all want to have our voices heard, but how can the reader/listener differentiate between the responsible and the irreponsible?  Almost impossible.

     That said, and with all the good and responsible sources out there, available at the touch of a finger, I think I’m going to use this space less for my political rantings and opinions, and more for personal thought on events, items and material nearer and dearer to my heart.  Which is not to say that I won’t, on occasion, let loose on the issues that are so well covered by others, but rather  I can use this space to take a cathartic approach to things on my mind, and which may be of interest to others.  Then again, maybe not.

     One can only wonder what happpened to Tim Pawlenty — a man from a blue collar, hardworking family, the only one who made it to college, who enjoyed the benefits of financial aid along the way, good-looking, intelligent, engaging, a man who led the Minnesota legislature, and then the State, as Governor. 

     Somewhere along the line he fell in with the far right-wing conservatives, became a legend in his own mind, and as visions of sugar plums (in the form of the White House) danced in his head, managed to abandon the decent ideals of his upbringing to morph into an arrogant, self-centered insensitive individual who was — and is — willing to throw the needy of his state (and indeed all other Minnesotans as well) to the wind in search of his own ambitions.

     Married to a ludicrous “No-tax” philosophy in the face of the national and state economic recession, Pawlenty took a regal (and illegal) stance with regard to the state budget, unalloted several billions of funds, including medical and health cares for the neediest of the citizenry, and ran the state into a record deficit because of his hard-headedness and need to please the right-wing.  For the last few months, while ignoring the state, he has been flying all over the country speaking to GOP groups and trying to endear himself to the far-right, while a state which frequently led the nation in numerous important categories teeters on the edge.

    T-Paw, as he is known locally, recently told Newsweek magazine that “I’m not going to start raising taxes now.”  No, what he’s done is cut back on local government aid to cities and counties (promised and budgeted money), and forced localities — and school districts — to raise property taxes, levies, and find alternate means while at the same time healthcare, educational standards, and the cost of higher education, suffered immeasurably.

   He deceitfully told Newsweek that Minnesota “balanced the budget every year without raising taxes…”  No, he just dumped the responsibility on the localities, who had to raise taxes.  Hypocrisy.  Rather than roll back tax relief unwisely given to — in particular — the wealthiest citizens during the “Mensa” administration of Jesse Ventura, Pawlenty would veto any effort to restore those billions — with a B — to the tax rolls.

     He suggests that “Congress should cut current domestic spending”  including “a government takeover of healthcare” just as he did in Minnesota, where private individuals, healthcare and education took a Ventura-like body slam.  T-Paw even suggested that the Iraq War “may turn out to have been beneficial”  (wasn’t that W’s unitelligent blunder).  Whatever threatens regulation in the private sector seems to be wrong, in Pawlenty’s glazed-over view, who also opposes gay marriage (although he once supported a bill prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation), and basically sticks to the conservative talking points.  [His deceptive and fuzzy answer on cross-dressing by Minnesota elementary schools educators is not to be believed].

     Taken to Court over his budget unallotment scheme, Pawlenty was recently rebuked  by a highly respected jurist who found his actions unconstitutional.  he suggested that she crossed over into a legislative area — by ruling on a lawsuit properly brought, and which determined that it was he who usurped the role of the legislature with his unconstitutional methods.  So who crossed the line?

     I never thought of Pawlenty, who first appeared on “Access” 11 years ago, as a complete hypocrite;  I thought of him as someone who differed politically, but who would never let rampant ambition strangle his oath of office.  Now I think of him as The Man Who Would be King. Â

     With Barack Obama’s election there were millions of us, some as old and jaded as I am, filled with hope that perhaps things would change.  Another idol with clay feet?  Granted, the man has been in office less than one year, came in facing monumental problems caused by the Bush administration and its criminal conduct, and he has tried to move in many directions — perhaps too far too fast, but I find, among other things, his conduct in the health care crisis disappointing, to say the least.

     Obama has made gestures, been a media darling, and used his gift of public speaking and persuasion to warrant attention, but where is the word we don’t hear any more — single payer?  Ah, how soon we forget.

     In a country controlled by lobbyist dollars, shamefully, and by the members of Congress which those dollars buy, even more shamefully, and a U.S. Senate constricted by archaic rules where one member (often representing a minute fraction of the population) can stymie legislation, I wonder if our wonderful system is working.  Or is it really wonderful?  No question about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, no question of the intent of our Founding Fathers, but how has greed and corruption and conflict of interest so managed to turn the dream of our democracy into an absymal  morass of self-interest and self-dealing?

     As I have said over the years, why must every other industrialied — yes, even civilized — nation in the world offer their citizens some form of single payer for health care while this nation, supposedly the world’s “shining light” can’t even offer decent, affordable health care to its people?  The system is strangling the concept, while people die daily for the lack of care.  And the Congress feeds us double-talk and rhetoric as if to convince themselves that they have accomplished a miracle.

     A miracle would have been Medicare E — with stroke of a pen insuring the right of all Americans to health care.  We started our hearing the words single-payer, which faded quickly before the likes of the perfidious Max Baucus, who takes millions in contributions from the health care and pharmaceutical industry, while he warms his bed with a lover whom he tried to foist off as a U.S. Attorney candidate, then gave her a $14,000 raise as an employee, and who has said, in effect to paraphrase Marie Antoinette (with apologies to her less than admirable memory), “Let them eat cake.”  Millions of Americans have no more than crumbs, if that.

     Or the likes of the Republicans, who still haven’t receovered from the election of a Black President, and automatically say “NO” to every proposal.  I would not be surprised that if Sen. Harry Reid (who on occasion finds the gonads to stand up for progress, but far less often than he should) suggested anything to the Senate, no matter how beneficial to the electorate, that the GOP would of habit vote “No.”

     Joe Lieberman, who is a turncoat on positions probably more often than he changes his underwear, and who opposed what the people of his state overwhelmingly want…oh, I forgot his wife’s ties to the Health Care barons.  Conflict of interest, not in Joe’s eyes!   He claims to be a pious man, but he makes a mockery of piety.  Or, as it was said, “Beward of a pious fool, and of a wise sinner.”  It shames me as a Jew to see the sanctimonious Lieberman keep the Sabbath, profess to be a moral man, and ignore the basic tenets of morality and decency regarding health care.

       And so single payer became public option which became cooperatives which became…and so it goes.  And children die.  It makes me ashamed, and it makes me rethink the faith I had that this new Administration would make a change, no matter what the consequences — or at least a concerted effort — be it health care,  or not sending more of our finest and bravest to their deaths in foreign lands which are unconquerable and in which we should not be spilling blood in the face of centuries of historical lessons.

     And so, once again it is Hannukah.  Will the light in the temple burn for eight days, or is it flickering from lack of oxygen?

SPOTTER REPORT -  Governor Tim Pawlenty was spotted at MSP airport.  Must have been changing planes for a trip to another state or country, don’t ya think?

                                                     * * * * *  

On the day before Thanksgiving, the inventor of the “pop up” children’s book died.  It really shook up the services when they opened the casket and…up he popped.         

                                                       * * * * *

THE CHUTZPAH AWARD - To Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, an outstanding mayor who announced his run for Governor only two days after winning re-election in November, 2009.  So much for serving out your term.

 PAWLENTY OF QUESTIONS - As Governor Tim Pawlenty cruises the nation seeking the GOP Presidential nomination, disingenuous in his denials, one wonders whether Minnesotans are paying for his State Police bodyguards as he ignores his electorate.

JOE MUST GO - Joe Lieberman, for any number of reasons, must be stripped of his Chairmanship and cashiered from the Democratic Party, for 1) threatening his filibuster if the health care bill has a public option; 2) for deciding, without any qualifications, that the Ft. Hood shooter is an Islamic Terrorist, in the face of qualified medical opinions that he is an unbalanced soldier; 3) for protecting his wife who lobbies for the health care industry, instead of representing the overwhlming will of his constituents on health care; 4) for trashing every campaign promise he made two years ago.

HEALTH CARE - How come it’s the ones who have health care who don’t want those without to have it, often trumpeting the cost, but never say a word about the trillion they supported for the Iraq unnecessary war or any of the other monies squandered in the last decade.

DID YOU KNOW - That every member of Congress and the Senate receives a base salary of over $161,000, and in addition, the taxpayers pay for 72% of their healthcare costs, with numerous choices for them to choose from.  Did the Founding Fathers envision a class of Royalty?  Hypocrites!

DO YOU WONDER - Whether Rudy Guiliani will be on Bernie Kerik’s visitors list in prison.  After all, this is his business partner/buddy whom he wanted to head up Homeland Security.  You did a great job, Bernie!

OR EVEN WONDER - How much good $100 million that NYC Mayor Bloomberg spent (of his own fortune) to get himself re-elected (after changing the term limits rule) could have done if he had directed it to the needy instead of his ego?

DO YOU WISH - That those of us who supported Barack Obama would like to see him show some of the toughness of  LBJ in dealing with the nation’s problems instead of sucking up to a GOP which will never support anything he supports, or not banging heads with wishy-washy Dems who would rather take a lobbyist’s money than fight for their constituents?

ARE THE LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM - With Tamiflu at a premium and far behind scheduled release (surprise!), why on earth did the Wall St. vultures responsible for our financial scandal, get supplies and injections ahead of needy children and pregnant women?  Heads should roll, all the way up to the Secretary of HHS!

FUZZY MATH - The Republicans are doing victory dances, as though they have won next year’s elections, when they won two Governor’s races (one incumbent was an incompetent screw-up, and the other in a toss-up state) while at the same time all the Special Congressional elections have gone to Democrats, who also took six of eight big-city Mayoral elections?

I HAD A DREAM - That the members of Congress and the House decided to represent the voters in their districts fairly, eschewed lobbyist money to fight for the will of the voters and bettering the nation rather than worrying about their own re-elections and padding their bankrolls.  Damn, it was only a dream!

MARY TRAVERS

   I didn’t know Mary Travers, but her death, an echo of the ’60’s, has had a surprising impact on me.  Peter, Paul and Mary had a special place in my lexicon of that era, along with Joan Baez, the Kingston Trio and several other groups.  They spoke in my voice, echoed my emotions.

    Mary Travers was a few years younger than I, and that, too, has its special impact.  I have spent far too much time in recent years attending funerals, reading the obits of people I knew or respected, hearing of friends and relatives who have been stricken with disease.  We all know that as we get older, the parts break down, sometimes repairable, sometimes not.  In the last eight months I have had two hernia operations (the second a re-do of the first) and a skin cancer procedure.  A decade ago I thought it was all over when I learned I had prostate cancer, but an operation with the implanting of radioactive seeds seemed to alleviate that problem.

     The thing about it is — we never know.  Oh, yes, we never know when we step off the curb, or when we get in our car, but the fact is that we know from childhood that the final day will come.  I think that as you get older, it’s more on your mind, although I like to think I’ve adopted the philosphy of my mother, who died three years ago at 99, and always looked ahead, never looked back.  The fact that she was active and had all her faculties until the final few days was a gift.

   It must be reassuring to believe that death takes us to a better place, but it’s not a belief that I’ve ever shared.  Since childhood I’ve accepted that when it’s over, it’s over.  I guess the best one can hope for is to live on in memory, or in deed.  And hope that the memories are pleasant ones, ones which will make someone smile, or laugh, or feel warmer inside.

     The first five decades of my life were not something I look back upon too fondly, except for the birth of children.  And I didn’t handle fatherhood very well, as I look back over a litany of mistakes.  There are many things from those years that I regret, that I wish offered the opportunity for do-overs — I wish I had been a stronger person, both morally and emotionally.   But the past, as they say, is past.

     I’ve been fortunate enough, however, to have the next 25 years in which I like to think I’ve become a very different person, and to find a relationship which has helped make my life more meaningful, with a companion who is tolerant and caring.  We’ve been together over 20 years, married over 13, and that support has been in large part responsible for me to adopt new passions, to reassess, to move forward.  Certainly that’s been more than many have had, for which I will be greatful to the end.  This is beginning to sound maudlin, and that was not my intent as I sat down to write instead of grading papers, but there are always things swirling around that we leave unsaid, so I digressed.

     If anything I’m more liberal (I think progressive is the P.C. term), more active, and I hope more compassionate than ever before, and look forward to the future with excitement and anticipation.  I don’t know what will happen as I step off that next curb, or snap on my seatbelt, but in retrospect, I can’t complain.  All this because of Mary Travers, a woman I never met, but I thank her for it.

     A glimmer of hope…but perhaps Obama and his advisers are finally starting to get it.  Not talking tough enough, mind you, but realizing that the people who pushed him over the top — yes, he won — based their support on his stands, his words and the party platform, and nothing less.

     Plus the realization that the Republican party, and the Conservatives will do anything negative and nothing positive in order to make him fail.  As the scandals roll out, one after another, and the criminal conduct of the Bush administration, whether it is lying us into war and responsibility for the death of tens of thousands, whether it is the perfidious conduct in Iraq by Blackwater and its minions, the Halliburton thievery, the constant lying to the people, the ramping up of fear, the latest admissions of Tom Ridge about raising the “terror level” right before the election only for political reasons, the scandal of the Federal Attorney firings, the loss of memory of every member of the Administration in the investigations, the blatant hiring of incompetents in jobs which required intellect and experience, the criminal neglect which became the Katrina fiasco, the Valarie Plame debacle, the fact that Cheney and Rove are still not behind bars, nor is George W. in a home for the mentally impaired, and on and on — ad nauseum — none of which gets even a whimper of condemnation from the right wing, should leave no doubt to Obama that his success will be measured by living up to what he stood for and hopefully still stands for,  and that success will have to fashioned by the President himself.  Bi-partisanship is non-existent.

     It’s just seven months since Barack Obama stepped into the mess that the Bush Administration left behind, so let’s review just a little of what he has accomplished in so short a period of time — perhaps taking on too much too fast.  We were on the verge of a financial collapse and national recession, reeling from the trillion plus dollars that the Iraq War cost (a war we were lied into, I repeat), with rising unemployment, foreclosures, home sales lagging, industry gasping its last breaths, etc.  Of course, not one of the naysayers of today said a word or raised a finger to object as the nation spiraled toward international oblivion.

     In seven months, Obama fashioned TARP, which, despite its shortcomings, stabilized the financial markets even though the rush to do so came at a price which exemplified the expression “haste makes waste.”  The right wing of course, was critical (except for saving the big corporations upon whom they feed), even in the face of the fact that their support of trashing regulations were the main factor that corporate and financial greed ran rampant and unchecked.

     The stimulus package — opposed by the Republicans and Conservatives, and today the market marches forward as it approaches 9500 (the Dow), far above its downward spiral.

     Cash for Clunkers — again, uniform right-wing opposition and condemnation, although the program was instantly successful, exceeded all hope, helping the auto industry, dealers, suppliers, creating jobs, reopening closed automobile production, etc.

   Home sales move upward for the first time in several years, the job market is starting to stablize (helped by extending jobless benefits which the right wing, consistent if not humanitarian opposed).  In other words, Obama inherited an abysmal mess and has been leading us out of the wilderness — in seven months and without a shred of assistance from the Republicans and their retinue.

     We are getting out of Iraq, as he promised, (and I wish I could say the same of Afghanistan) and on schedule, and most importantly, Obama’s meetings with world leaders have begun to restore the prestige and credibility which this nation had lost in  eight downward spiraling Bush years.  All in seven months.

    Which leaves us with, among other problems, health care (the subject of other articles, past and to come) and the realization that Republicans have no plan, have no thoughts other than to throw roadblocks into whatever Obama and the Democrats (and Independents) come up with.  It will be a go-it-alone process, and once that realization sinks into, the march forward begins.

   In seven months — incredible.

   The word today is that “officials” of the Obama administration are indicating that Obama will jettison the public option provision of the still incomplete health care proposal, if necessary.

If necessary?

That’s what he ran on, what he said he’d fight for, what was allegedly a cornerstone of his campaign.  No, not actually public option but single payer.  Walking away from single payer, gravitating to public option was the first compromise.

With Republicans like Sen. Grassley spitting in his face, and blatantly lying, he still wants to “negotiate.”  Frankly, that’s B.S.  He won riding the backs of many of us who believed, who thought he had courage, and if he turns his back now — with majorities in both houses of Congress, rather than getting tough with the recalcitrant Democrats, then who knows what else he will give up.

I voted for change, not for George W. Bush “Lite.”

     As a nation which likes to take the mantel as the leading democracy in the world, and often as the world’s conscience (if you can forget Abu Grahib and the unnecessary wars) and policeman (151 bases in 73 other countries, I have been told), how come we still rank 37th among industrialized nations in health care, 25th in child mortality, and still spend more than twice as much as any other civilized nation on our health care?

     Because our system “sucks,” to put it crudely, and because our legislators — Senators and members of Congress are frequently more afraid of not being re-elected than they care about their constituents, the voters.  They are subservient to lobbyists, and the billions of dollars that flow into their election coffers from those lobbyists, the health care industry, pharmaceutical companies, and the plethora of vultures who feast on the carrion which is the ordinary citizen.

     I was hoping that the President would put the leaders of Congress against the wall and demand that they not take their August vacation until they had passed a health care bill that promised care for every American, at the least a public option, and even better, single payer coverage like so much of the rest of the world enjoys.  But the President chose the “diplomatic” way of dealing with Congress although I would have preferred that he speak less softly and carried a big stick. 

     Statistics indicate that 14,000 Americans lose their health care every day — an alarming and frightening figure.  While Congress is off in August, enjoying their “vacations” (and raising re-election cash to hang on to their regal status in our society), thousands will die from lack of adequate health care.  That alone should mandate that Congressional leaders, at the urging of the President, withhold that summer break unless and until the health care crisis it solved.  Clearly, the overwheming percentage of voters opt for single payer;  it’s a question of the good of the majority versus the obscene profits of a small, monied minority.  It’s a matter of conscience and morality.

     You have heard all the lies and the fear mongering — there will be long lines at the doctors, you’ll have to wait for necessary services, small businesses will go bankrupt (excuse me, have you noticed what’s happening to small businesses?), the wealthy cannot bear another 1% tax on their substantial incomes, and on and on.  Frankly, it is absolute bovine excrement (B.S.).  And it’s fed by a system that is pouring $1.5 million A DAY into advertising which is at best misleading, and at worst, more B.S.  And while we no doubt have the best medical care available in the world,  other nations with single payer or similar systems do not suffer the horrors that we have been led to believe.  I’ve spoken with people from many nations, including six in the last month, and the fairy tales don’t hold water.

     These same people who talk about a trillion dollars cost over ten years — many of whom have been in Congress during the whole of the last administration — where were they and how did they vote on the money for the Iraq war, which caused the spiral of our economy into near disaster?  That’s a trillion dollars there, and continuing at millions every day.  And where were they, where were their voices on the Halliburton no-bid contracts, or calling for an investigation when $9 billion in cash suddenly disappeared.  These people have no right to have a voice at this table.

     FACT:  Every member of Congress and every Senator earns a salary of $172,000 a year, plus staff fees, plus office expenses, plus other emouluments if they are senior members, or for committee chores, etc.  And that’s paid by US, the taxpayers.

     FACT:  Every member of Congress and the Senate has their choice of about ten (10) different health care plans — that start on the first day of their term, and are offered regardless of pre-existing conditions — and 72% of the cost of those plans is also borne by US, the taxpayers.  And it includes drug and pharma costs as low as $5 per prescription.  Thus, WE, the taxpayers, not only pay their salaries, but three-quarters of their health care and drug costs!  There is one Senator who pays all of $209 a month for this gold plated coveragte.  Let’s see how many of them would continue to opt against universal health care if they were cast into our lifeboat.

     FACT: Emergency room care is far more expensive than regular medical care, and yet that is where many uninsured and even underinsured have to go for treatment.  It adds horrendous costs to medical care, and if you speak of where is a trillion dollars going to come from to pay for revisions in our medical care in the next decade, you can start right with savings in the emergency rooms.  They should be for true emergencies, and not to treat people who have waited too long with illness because they have been unable to pay for it.  Preventative care, as well, which would  be written into the new-vision health care, would likewise save huges amounts of money and would lead to a healthier America able to take essential and necessary steps to prevent conditions which spiral into astronomical costs down the road.

     You hear a lot about “Blue Dog” Democrats — the ones who are in the opposition because they are “financial watchdogs” claiming we can’t afford the expense of this coverage for all.  I’ve heard them more aptly described as “Blue Cross” Democrats, which is much more appropriate — they support all that’s wrong with the system, with no regard for anything except their own re-elections.  The health care of the Veterans’ Administration is stellar and much less expensive than it is for the average citizen;  Medicare runs on less than 4% administrative costs when the average insurance company-HMO-health care system runs as high as 30%.  Why is the V.A. able to negotiate the cost of drugs, to lower the expense, and yet under the last administration, that same right was denied to the rest of us?  It’s just indicative of the corruption of the existing system.

     As a senior citizen, I’m still working  because I can’t afford not to — the cost of health care would be the end of my “golden” days.  And 53% of bankruptcies in this nation arise because of people who are driven into poverty by health care costs.  Yet executives in health care companies retire with as much as Dr. Maguire of United Health, a $1.8 billion (yes, with a B) golden parachute.  That money, those bonuses and boondoogles should  be going into patient care, research, development, and not to line the pockets of overpaid administrators of a broken system.

     How come we don’t hear more about the health care that Congress is provided with?  Because it’s one of their dirty little secrets that they don’t want you to know.  Senator Max Baucus of Montana, who wouldn’t even let single-payer representatives testify before his committe hearing, has received more from the health industry and big pharma than any other member of Congress.  That’s why I called for him to be cast out of the Democratic Party several months ago.  And I renew that call, even though he purports to have modified his stand.  Not only that, the same principle applies to all those other purported “Democrats” who have supped at the largesse of the corporate healthcare predators, and who now suddenly express hesitancy in the face of the party platform, which in reality means campaign contributions.

     I understand the Republican opposition — they don’t give a damn about the poor and the middle class, the minorities and the needy, and they make no bones about it.  They represent the monied interests of this nation, and if they had their way, would drive us into a society of royalty and the peons, and right back into the Middle Ages.  At least they’re up front about it, voting against everything progressive move, kneeling before the gun lobby, railing about no new taxes while they support a war whose costs were hidden, whose toll was both human and economic, and who, in the words of their leader and seer Rush Limbaugh, “hopes Obama fails.”  If Obama fails, we all fail, and so does this nation.  It’s that simple.

     The naysayers can’t deal with the truth, can’t deal with progress and far-thinking leadership which, over a long a painful decade, may pull us out of this morass.  They can only oppose every item brought up by the current administration, or find reasons to attack administration appointments and ideas.  But I digress.

     Should a member of Congress or the Senate, who has taken tens of thousands, and in some cases hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions from an industry such as health care, then be able to vote on issues affecting that same industry?  Under current rules, they do.  But isn’t this a blatant conflict of industry?  Do you vote against the hand that feeds you, that keeps you in office?  Inevitably, they don’t, and that feeds into the improprieties which guide our health care.

     There is only one solution this year and in the next election — to any member of Congress who votes against the reforming of the health care system, whether Republican or Democrat, who opposes the public option, or hopefully single payer, and that solution is TTBO. Throw the Bums Out!

    �

Next »